British and Irish
Politicians, since Tony Blair came to power, have
deliberately deceived and lied to their electorates
on a referendum on EU membership!
Its the same in Britain and
Ireland! There is a pattern in Ireland and in the UK!
That is NO coincidence!
That is a conspiracy to deceive the British and Irish
electorates and to "ensure each step to EU
political Union with Germany in the driving
seat" - a Federal Union, which will certainly
become an aggressive police and Military superstate!
From the The Daily Mail October 2011
"The country has had enough of deception.
It's time to close the yawning gap between the ruling
and the ruled"
"How's this for a starkly unequivocal
promise? The European Union has evolved
significantly since the last public vote on
membership over 30 years ago. Liberal Democrats,
therefore, remain committed to an in/out referendum
the next time a British Government signs up for
fundamental change in the relationship between the UK
and the EU.
Such was the solemn manifesto pledge made to the
British people by every Lib Dem candidate who stood
for election less than 18 months ago.
Yet on Monday night, guess how many of the
partys 57 MPs stood by that promise and voted
for a Commons motion approving the principle of an EU
referendum that would include an in/out option?
Clegg and Cameron
The shocking answer is just one Adrian
Sanders of Torbay a solitary honourable man in
a party of puppets. As with tuition fees, the other
56 apparently thought nothing of breaking their word
to the people who voted them into power. Or how about
this for another unequivocal manifesto pledge?
We will be positive members of the European
Union but we are clear that there should be no
further extension of the EUs power over the UK
without the British peoples consent. We will
ensure that by law, no future Government can hand
over areas of power to the EU or join the euro
without a referendum of the British people.
So said the Conservatives, every one of them,
before that same election in May 2010 and all
praise to the 96 (out of 306) Tories who mounted the
biggest rebellion in their partys modern
history on Monday night, keeping their word to their
constituents and defying their leaders orders
to vote against the motion.
But given that manifesto pledge, what in the name
of integrity possessed David Cameron to impose a
three-line whip in the first place, instructing his
MPs to breach their electors trust on pain of
losing their government jobs or their hopes of
promotion to the front bench?
Truly, there is something hideously wrong with the
state of democracy in Britain today, when candidates
say one thing to the electorate, only to be told by
their party leaders to do the direct opposite when
they are voted into the Commons.
The supreme irony of Mondays debate is that
it was called in answer to a mass public petition, in
accordance with a pre-election Conservative pledge
that was meant to prove the partys
determination to reconnect the political class with
the people. In the event, the e-petition gimmick
served only to highlight and deepen the yawning
democratic deficit between the rulers and the ruled
Nowhere, of course, has that deficit been more
glaringly apparent over the years than in the
political establishments contempt for voters in
all matters touching upon Europe. Indeed, the entire
history of the relentless expansion of the EUs
powers since we joined what was then the Common
Market in 1973 has been a tale of brazen deceit,
broken promises and disenfranchisement of the
electorate by all three major political parties.
Remember Labours 2005 manifesto pledge on
the new European Constitution? We will put it
to the British people in a referendum. Nothing,
surely, could have been more unequivocal.
Yet when it came to signing the Lisbon Treaty, in
which the new constitution was enshrined, Gordon
Brown conveniently forgot about it. Or, rather, he
fobbed off the public with the monstrous lie that
Lisbon (referred to in official documents as
the Constitutional Treaty) was not, in
fact, a European Constitution at all.
The Tories and Lib Dems were no better. Both
promised explicitly to put the Constitution to a
referendum. But as soon as they were in a position to
do so, they smirked and said: No point now.
Lisbons been signed. Wherever Europe is
concerned, theres always some snivelling
shysters excuse, some weasel-worded legalistic
technicality seized on by the politicians to wriggle
out of their commitment to give the public their say.
(And these days, when all else fails, theres
always that catch-all standby: Sorry, old boy.
The Coalition agreement wont allow it.)
So it is that, one by one, the ancient powers of
Britains once sovereign Parliament, paid for by
the blood of our ancestors, slip away to Brussels
into the hands of unaccountable European
Commission, where voters will never be able to touch
them again. (And how can we boast of the Wests
belief in liberal representative government while
that abomination against democracy holds increasing
sway over every aspect of our lives, from immigration
control to working hours?)
By Jason Groves Daily Mail
David Cameron is
"programmed" to sell out Britain to the
Germans who are in virtual control of the EU
"Federal State" in the making!
I believe Camerons latest snub to Merkel and
Sarkozy's plans to "change" regulations
regarding the Euro should not be construed as a
demonstration of his "EU-skepticism"!
Cameron is a signed up member of the Europhile club
and their agenda is to undermine and dismantle the
political union of the United Kingdom and do their
very best to degrade the peoples beliefs and identity
- of what it is to be proud of being British!
Watch out for the "disguised" steps he
initialises to degrade everything in British society
that makes Britons proud of their nationality! The
breaking up of the UK - if Scotland votes for
independence,- this would be a big step towards a
weakened Briton and "Cast-Iron" has already
ordered the closing down of Defence Regional
"co-ordination" centres, which would weaken
Britains ability to organise military resistance to a
military attack on Britain! Cast-Iron has also
pledged to reduce Britains armed forces by 2020 to
around 20000 - ripe for a takeover by the vengeful
and ravenous Huns - sitting over there opposite the
White Cliffs, which thwarted their plans to invade in
1940! They will wait until their British neo-Quisling
puppets do their rotten work for them!
There has been a conspiracy, starting with Blair,
then Brown and finally proven with Cameron that the
pro- EU (German) traitors have conspired to somehow
place their puppets as leaders of all UK parties,
with the intention of selling out Britain to its age
old enemies - the Krauts! Why? The answer is motive!
The Germans have been planning this from the end
of WW11! Read what James Warburg of CFR at a US
Senate Committee boasted about not 10 years after the
fall of the Third Reich!
"They will have their New World Order - by
circumventing national sovereignty or by a frontal
assault!" This was part of a threat made by -
James Warburg - a member of the "Council on
Foreign Relations" in 1950.
Friends of Liberty - Congressman Larry McDonald
Exposed the New World Order Tyranny Congressman Larry
McDonald Exposed the New World Order Tyranny -
Hidden History of Money
by Alexander James - The Hidden History of Money
June 15th, 2004 On February 17, 1950, CFR member
James Warburg (banker, and architect of the Federal
Reserve System) stated before a Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, "We shall have one world
government whether or not you like it, by conquest or
consent." Again, the media remained silent.
In the April 1974 issue of the CFR journal,
"Foreign Affairs", page 558, Richard
Gardener states that the new world order "will
be built... but an end run around national
sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will
accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal
Also, Britain has NO "special
relationship" with the USA! No longer! Maybe
when Roosevelt or Eisenhower were presidents but not
now! The US Military, Intelligence Depts, Corporate
USA, which "chooses" all presidential
candidates, are culturally pro-German and share the
same asperations of a German dominated Europe and a
"Western" dominated (controlled) New World
Order! The American branch of the German Bund and the
thousands of German Nazis who were taken to the US
after WW11 have changed the USA into a
"bastard" nation of the German motherload!
The US military and CIA are controlled by those who
are culturely of German descent!
Cameron is in the control of a neo Moseleyite
faction within the UK! He is dismantling Britains
defence forces deliberately - under the pretence of
saving money and he has promised to reduce Britains
armed forces down to 20,000 by 2020 ; no doubt most
or all of the higher ranking military staff will be
those who are EU skeptics and critics! This will
conveniently leave Britain unable to resist a foreign
militarily intervention if the British rise up in
revolt against Camerons or Cleggs plans to destroy
Britain militarily and economically!
If someone or group within the British middle
classes or military dont do something soon, Britains
1000 year history will be only a pipedream! Everyone
in Britain and Ireland will be under the heel of the
If the reader thinks this is just a rant - maybe
or maybe I just see things as they really are -
Britain and Irelands freedom and independence are in
more danger today than they were in 1939-1945!
The Irish can take no solace because Germany
supplied the Irish Republicans with guns in 1916 -
that was only in "their" interests to
weaken Britain in time of war! In the lead up to war
in 1939, the leaders of the Nazi Third Reich did not
want to make war on Britain because they saw the
British as a "truely Nordic nation" and
because they had Germans in-situ within the British
I have often quoted this scenario! -- The British
sent the rebellious Irish and Scots to Australia and
Canada - the Hun would have exterminated them!
Think of motive! Ask yourself - which nation has
the greatest motive for revenge to destroy Britain!
There is only one answer to that question -
Ireland has identical liars
and traitorous EU puppet rats!
Ireland's Labour Party Deputy First Minister -
Tanaiste Eamon Gilmore, has treated the electorate
who voted for him and the Labour Party like the dirt
under his shoe by promising his Labour Party members
and the electorate that there would NOT be a re-run
on the defeated Lisbon Treaty, which was defeated in
JUne 2008, but in secret he would do anything to get
the Lisbon Treaty re-run! He reported to his
Obermeisters in the American Embassy that his
opposition for a second re-run of the Lisbon Treaty
was only "politically necessary"!
....... ...........the treacherous ............
'Gilmore 'took opposing
views in public and in private'
By Fionnan Sheahan Political Editor
Wednesday June 01 2011
TANAISTE Eamon Gilmore privately told US diplomats
he would support the holding of a second referendum
on the Lisbon Treaty -- despite publicly saying the
opposite, a leaked embassy cable reveals.
In a candid disclosure that will prove
embarrassing for the Labour Party leader,
a leaked US Embassy cable
says he admitted a "public posture" of
opposition to a second referendum because it was
"politically necessary". At the same time,
Mr Gilmore fully expected a second referendum and
said he would support it.
After the No vote in the first Lisbon referendum
in June 2008, the Labour leader said the "Lisbon
Treaty is dead" and opposed a second referendum
being held. But Mr Gilmore presented a different
scenario a month later to US embassy staff, according
to then US Ambassador Thomas Foley.
"Gilmore, who has led calls against a second
referendum, has told the embassy separately that he
fully expects, and would support, holding a second
referendum in 2009. He explained his public posture
of opposition to a second referendum as 'politically
necessary' for the time being," the Ambassador
said in a 'confidential' dispatch sent to his
colleagues in Washington and across the EU. Of
course, a year later, when the Government secured
concessions on Lisbon, Mr Gilmore and Labour did back
the second referendum. After the first referendum was
rejected, however, Mr Gilmore said there was no
question of the question being put a second time.
"The speculation that there will be a second
bite at it -- there won't be," he said on June
13, the day of the Lisbon I count. Mr Gilmore told
the Dail the following week the vote had to be fully
"That is why there can be no question of
going back to the people for a simple re-run of the
Lisbon treaty," he said on June 18. And the
Labour leader advised his colleagues in the European
Socialists on June 19 against assuming a second
referendum would be successful. When French President
Nicolas Sarkozy arrived in Dublin a month later, on
July 21, Mr Gilmore still held this position as he
told him there was "no basis for believing that
a second referendum would produce a result which is
any different from the first one".
But in that same week in July, Mr Gilmore was
presenting a different view to the US Embassy. Mr
Foley wrote his cable on July 23 -- just two days
after Mr Sarkozy met with the Yes and No campaigners
in Dublin -- where he presents Mr Gilmore's
expectation of a second referendum and his
"politically necessary" opposition to a
second vote. Mr Foley reported how Mr Sarkozy
followed his meeting with then Taoiseach Brian Cowen
by having separate meetings with Fine Gael leader
Enda Kenny and Mr Gilmore "According to press
reports, Kenny added that between now and October was
a 'period of reflection and analysis'." Sarkozy
reportedly emphasized that the following June's
Europe-wide elections imposed some time pressure to
resolve the issue.
"Both told Sarkozy that a second Lisbon
Treaty referendum before next June's elections is not
possible," Mr Foley said. The US Embassy also
spoke with Mr Kenny's chief of staff Mark Kennelly
who told them Fine Gael was "quite happy"
with the meeting and Mr Sarkozy's trip overall.
"He said that FG leaders believe Fall 2009 is
the most 'realistic timetable if there were to be a
second referendum'," Mr Foley wrote. Mr Gilmore
didn't give an expected date of a second referendum
but still said he expected it to happen.
- Fionnan Sheahan Political Editor Irish